Showing posts with label july. Show all posts
Showing posts with label july. Show all posts

Tuesday, 5 August 2014

Something about a one-legged pigeon.

Hey roberrrrto-reviews readers, whoever you may be. Today I thought I'd post something a little bit different. 


Being a review blog, it's natural that my blog is just filled with reviews on the latest books I've been reading. But to be honest, this is straying from my original intentions with this blog. While I love reviewing and will continue to do so, this blog will definitely be changing (hopefully for the better) - I've had an identity crisis here. While my youtube is a collection of whatever I feel like making, here I've been quite basic and rigid. Today sees a change, today I talk about my weekend. You can pass this by and read another review, but this is just one of the few changes I'd like to make here. I'd like to do more reviews on film, do more blog posts on what I've been up to, on where I've been, on whatever I want to really. I initially started out writing about my university life (posts can be seen here), and I'd like to add-on to those posts as I embark on my final year of university (scary!)

Anyway, today's blog post is one in a couple of posts in which I talk about my weekend away in Northumberland and Scotland. This particular anecdote is in regards to a pigeon-obsessed man, an unattended bag and arriving in Alnmouth. 




I arrived on Friday, after three trains, four hours and some panic in the train station about unattended bags. Yes, I was that idiot. You hear the announcements in train stations about bags being removed due to them having been unattended for a while, and while it is probably just a forgetful person, some of us do over-react. It's like the train station is saying, "be afraid, be very afraid!" 

But yes, whilst I awaited for a connecting train from Manchester Piccadilly to York, I had a sit down, ate a sandwich (kind-of, I'm known for never being able to finish them - boring fact -), and marvelled at the man sat next to me. You see, the pigeon on the floor had been stood, observing my eating habits, hoping for food and attention. As it stood, it decided to stand on one leg, maybe the other fell asleep? Maybe the pigeon's like me - whilst volunteering at a charity shop, and when bored, I tend to hold one leg, I don't know why, when we have no customers and I'm not using the till, I get a bit bored and obviously, slightly strange- anyway, the pigeon was stood on one leg. The man next to me, pointed to it, gave a laugh and giggled with his wife. However, this was not enough. I could see the desire within the man's inability to sit still that laughing was not enough. He wanted to see this other leg. It's almost as if he wanted it to be one-legged. Which isn't uncommon, I've seen quite a few pigeons with one leg, it's a sad sight. But maybe this guy wasn't from Manchester and needed proof that it did have one leg. He stood up slowly, made his way around to the back of the pigeon. I could almost hear the pigeon thinking, "God, not again", as he lunged forward to pick it up. 


Well, I have never jumped so much in my life as the pigeon flapped its wings and flew at me. The man knelt on one knee laughing. I have a slight phobia of pigeons, especially when they flap their wings. So, after being bewildered and traumatised by the pigeon, and copying its flailing movements, I went for my train. (I may or may not have been having heart palpitations at this point). 


The platform was busy and full of people waiting to get on the train, naturally. I was a bit nervous about getting my seat. I'm one of those who loves train journeys,that is, I love train journeys when you're comfortably in a seat you know is yours and have your book out, but until I'm at that point I'm nervous. You have to fish out your ticket, your seat reservation, panic at the undoubtable situation in which you have to tell a stranger they're in your seat (slight human interaction), and then dump your things in the storage above you, whilst others are trying to push past you to get to a free seat and push their pram down the aisle. It's hectic and I don't do well with those situations, especially alone. I am quite tragic.


But as I stood there watching a woman lift her suitcase onto the train, I had a moment of confusion. Why did that suitcase make me feel so panicky, oh yes, my brain clicked... you had a bag with you. Shit, shit, shit. I ran back to the pigeon-hotspot, only to find a policeman rummaging through my belongings. Oops. After explaining, slowly edging away to the platform in a state of apology and marvelling at his hat, I got on the train, found my seat on a table with a family of three, and was on my way. Phew!





Isn't it weird how nosy we can be? I mean, I don't mean to be rude, but when sat on a train and your book is most unfulfilling (I was reading Never Coming Back), one can't help but listen in to conversations. I didn't hear anything important or interesting, but I find it interesting that we can hear a fragment of someone's life, we're all colliding at one point, bound to never consciously meet again. From the impression I got, the grandfather wasn't as close to his son-in-law as he'd like to be, he'd probably insisted on the journey to be with his grandson, who was obsessed with trains and was impressively able to name every train that went past us. He had a magazine on the topic that the pair were eyeing intensely. The father seemed like a bit of a distant dad - not that i'm judging, just observing - he made calls to work, and also spoke about things to the grandfather in which he said he didn't know were happening because he just "goes to work". It seems quite sad, but nice that they were off somewhere together. I probably grinned and unnerved them. 


Anyway, I made my connection in York to Alnmouth, and after half-an-hour of being stood up, I found an empty seat and was told by a six-year-old boy that it seemed I'd been swallowing stones. Lovely. Actually, him, his mum and the girl next to me were all really nice, and it's quite a nice feeling sitting with strangers, maybe having a chat and learning about their life a bit, all before you disembark, go your separate ways, again to probably never speak again. I find it fascinating, and I'm glad there are still people sociable enough to have a talk with a stranger, just so the world seems like a slightly smaller and happier place. And whilst I can be socially awkward, just as long as they don't try to charm pigeons, I'm incredibly happy to chat back. 

Thursday, 31 July 2014

NEVER COMING BACK by Tim Weaver (SPOILER FREE)

Title: Never Coming Back (David Raker #4)
Author: Tim Weaver
Genre: Crime / Thriller
Originally Published: 2013
Page Count: 533 pages
Published by: Penguin

Date Read: 21st July - 30th July 2014

Never Coming Back is the fourth instalment of Tim Weaver's thrillers that use missing persons investigator, David Raker, as the protagonist. In this, my first, and Raker's fourth outing, we see Raker return to his family home in the south of England, recovering after the events of (what I assume was) the third book, 'Vanished'. Whilst there a body washes upon the shore, while at the same time an old flame visits him and asks him to investigate the disappearance of her sister, Carrie, and her family. 

This the basic gist of what sparks the rest of the novel. There are a series of flashbacks from Raker's past but mainly from other people as well, which I assume is just to keep the reader interested and so we're not just following Raker trying to piece things together whilst pissing everyone off in the process. The novel was confusing to start with, we start with Raker in 2007, and then we're in the shoes of former-Cop, Healy. It was confusing switching back and forth between the pair, who were both as annoying as one another. 

By the end of part one, we're essentially following just Raker with the occasional flashback to other characters in Las Vegas. The characters in the novel range from the stereotypical mob-boss with bird-like mannerisms (he reminded me a bit of Norman Bates, or Billy Drago in The Untouchables), to the equally stereotypical villagers, where Raker lives. The whole novel seems to focus on the enigma of one of these 'gangster-type' men, Cornell, whose stern seemingly follows everyone. 

I must admit this took a slightly different path from what I expected, I thought it was going to match that of Linwood Barclay's No Time For Goodbye, but it didn't. It became some political crime novel, which I really enjoyed.

The characters were frustrating, all the male characters are arsey with one another and can't seem to listen to each other. The dynamic between Healy and Raker was annoying, and as a first time reader with this series, I question Healy's relevance to the novel. I put in my review on goodreads: 

 "Read this if you like characters who are so arsey with other people it's a wonder people bother with them, several incredulous plot twists, and very descriptive writing."

The writing was clumsy at times with its phrasing, but what novel isn't nowadays? It was annoying that the most redundant things were being described to us. 


The strength of the novel comes with its mystery, it wasn't exactly original but it held my attention and kept me coming back for more. I just wish it strayed from the stereotypes, and had tried to keep its 'plot twists' down. I can't quite count how many chapter endings I could hear the 'Eastenders' credits sequence in my head. Despite this, the mystery was engaging, the writing was brilliant, and whilst I couldn't really care for Raker, I'll be checking out some more of his adventures soon. 4 stars.

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

THE EDGE OF REASON by Helen Fielding

Title: The Edge of Reason (Bridget Jones #2)
Author: Helen Fielding 
Genre: Chick Lit / Humour
Originally Published: 1999
Page Count:424 pages
Published by: Pan Books

Date Read: 10th July - 14th July 2014

This sequel carries on right where the previous one left us. Another year; another diary. Again it follows Bridget's life, her career, her love life, her mishaps, and for the most part it is funny, but I couldn't help feel the whole novel was redundant. 

The novel is kind of an exact replica of the first one. The events that happen to Bridget in life don't seem to be very 'life-changing' even though a lot of them certainly would be. I don't understand. She begins the novel happy because *slight spoiler from book one* she has a boyfriend. Wow. Well done, Bridget. But as soon as life loses its equilibrium of romance, Bridget is of course desperately trying to live life as a singleton, which naturally, for her, is the worst thing in the world. The only character I really love is Shazza, she's hilarious and tells Bridget when she's being pathetic. 

The novel does have its really funny moments. There's a part in which she gets to interview Colin Firth (a bit ironic, haha), and I just found it hilarious and relatable. I would probably act the same way if I had to interview, say, any of these men:



WOW! Isn't that a work of art? 


Now I may be looking at this too critically but one thing that really frustrated me about these two books in the series is Fielding’s characterisation of her gay characters. If we look at the gay people in the novel, they are either: sexually deficient and therefore shag anything that moves and whore themselves out there, incredibly pretentious and stuck up, or some form of older sexual piranha whose prey is the younger generation. I realise that Fielding exaggerates stereotypes throughout the novel for comic relief, but I just hope these stereotyped characteristics stay in the nineties, and with her 2013 sequel, Mad About The Boy, we find some level of maturity and character growth when it comes to Bridget’s perception and the author’s writing.

I find it rather of low wit to rely on exaggerated stereotypes for cheap laughs and it did kind of annoy me that it was that in which the author relies to make comedy. Of course Bridget's tribulations were sometimes hilarious themselves, which really made the novel great in the end. 

I seem fairly negative about this book, but how can I stay negative when there's that beautiful picture up there. Just stare at it. It's nice.
Anyway, I ended up rating this a 3 stars. It's decent, but I don't think I'll carry on with Bridget. I hope she finds some happiness and isn't a depressed single again, clinging to some form of respectability by having a boyfriend. Note to anyone reading this, as Jude says, being single is good. Amen. But damn, those men up there.




Monday, 14 July 2014

LET'S DO THIS! | Booktube-a-Thon 2014

Hey guys, 
So I've been fairly quiet about my participation in the Booktube-a-thon (I've been keeping it a secret, shhhh - I haven't. I'm trying to be funny. I failed).

The booktube-a-thon and everything you need to know will be linked here.

With the booktube-a-thon come challenges, and I'm attempting most of them. 
(With the exception of the challenge in which you are to start & finish a series. I instead (from Dani at PerformingBookFelf's recommendation) decided to start one series and finish a different series. Slightly cheating but, who cares? It's all for fun!

Here's the tbr in a cute little video, enjoy!




If you're taking part in the readathon, let me know which book you're most excited to read!



Thursday, 10 July 2014

BOY21 by Matthew Quick | Book Review (SPOILER FREE)


Title: Boy21
Author: Matthew Quick
Genre: Contemporary / YA
Originally Published: 2012
Page Count: 277 pages
Published by: Headline

Date Read: 10th July 2014

*Note: Book sent by publisher through Bookbridgr for review. All thoughts & feelings 100% genuine*

Boy21 is a multi-layered Young Adult contemporary novel, in which we follow the protagonist, Finley, a high school basketball player. Finley's life is a combination of looking after his 'Pop', sitting on his roof with his girlfriend, Erin, and basketball. When his Coach one day asks him to reach out to new student, Russ, as a favour, Finley's life gains a shadow and a friend who continues to go by the name 'Boy21' and believes he is from outer space and has a mission to complete. As the two boys develop a friendship in their town of gangs and racial divides, it becomes clear that their friendship is beneficial for both, as they both hide a past that they are refusing to confront. 

While the synopsis may sound a tiny bit ridiculous when I put it like that, the novel was infact quite breathtaking. I've never read any of Matthew Quick's work and I'll tell you straight away that I will be picking another of his novels up as soon as possible! It's so short and wonderful that I read it in an afternoon. 

There's more than just that synopsis I put together, there's the wonderful characters. (Note-to-self: Stop saying wonderful). Anyway, Finley is wonderful a breath of fresh air as a protagonist. He's a very quiet individual, but one who is always present and never judging. His growth in the novel is outstanding and you can't help but sympathise with him. Russ, or Boy21, was fantastic also. He was so imaginative and caring, there was definitely a sense of connection with the two boys. And finally an ode to Erin, for she was hilarious. Her interactions and mannerisms were so beautiful, you couldn't help but want to be best friends with her. 

The plot itself is intriguing. It can become clear that basketball was the centre of this novel, and that sport gave each boy a drive in their life when they needed it. In reality, however, its their friendship that drives this novel. The time they spend together, unjudging of one another, and discovering each other is what drives this novel and it was great that, although the love interest plays a big part of this novel, friendship was the glue that held together this YA novel, something which I feel is forgotten about with some of my recent YA reads. 

If you get a chance, pick this book up, it's much more powerful and warm (can a book be warm? I'm saying it can) than I first thought and I'm so grateful that Bookbridgr gave me an opportunity to read it. Definitely check it out. ☆ (4.5)